Ant-Semetism & Aparthied
Jewish Peer Attacks Violinist for Israel Apartheid
Please Watch Video

The Time Has Come: The Naked Truth About Jews _ YouTube

How Israel Was Created:
Israel is a country stolen from the Palestinians,
and fanatics control it's government.
Israel was birthed through
terrorizing and expelling Palestinians
from their ancestral lands"
Israelis are the Nazis of our time

An honest Israeli tells the Real Truth about Israel

Click:
Israel is the Real Terrorist State

The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1
Thomas Dalton

The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 2
Thomas Dalton

Zionism hijacked Judaism

Watch the video:
The conspiracy of Creating Israel

'BABYLON THE GREAT' IS ISRAEL

By Rev. Ted Pike

15 Feb 2012

"In a recent Bible study ("Mother of Harlots" in Old Testament and New) I do what virtually no pastor would dare read with emphasis broad passages out of the prophets identifying Israel as the mother of spiritual whoredom. I then discuss the following article, proving that the mother of harlots in Ezekiel and Hosea's day is exactly the same as now, corrupting the nations through Jewish media, creating interminable strife in the Middle East, and leading America into war after ruinous war to make the Mid-East safe for the harlot's further expansionism."

Christian Zionism is the glue that keeps present day state of Israel alive on the US taxpayer's dole.

Rupert Murdoch : master of world's media. Click and read

"The rabbis of Vienna were sent in 1897
on a fact-finding mission to Palestine
to investigate whether it was a suitable place
for Jewish settlement were right.
They reported back that the
“bride was beautiful but married to another man.”

The rabbis had been moved to visit Palestine by Theodore Herzl, a Jewish Austrian journalist, who had just published his highly influential book, “The Jewish State”, which launched the movement called “political Zionism”.

Herzl, a broad minded man, was happy to think of the new Israel in Argentina which had a considerable Jewish migration in the nineteenth century and was well away from the clutches of anti-Semitic Europe. He was also inclined to accept the offer of Joseph Chamberlain, then the British colonial secretary, for a site on the Uasin Gishu plateau near Nairobi in what was then British East Africa. The Zionist Conference overruled him.

But when the British government finally gave in to Zionist lobbying and, in the words, of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, favoured “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” the only Jewish member of the cabinet, Edwin Samuel Montague, denounced the whole project as a reconstruction of the tower of Babel. “Palestine”, he said, “would become the world’s ghetto”. Lord Curzon, the former Viceroy of India, observed that Britain had “a stronger claim to parts of France” than the Jews did to Palestine after two millennia of absence. He denounced it as an act of “sentimental idealism”.

Who Chose the Chosen People?

Helen Thomas's words:

"[The Israelis] most of them, came from somewhere else and to take people's land is just absolutely wrong. [In 1948] they would call different homes out and tell the people if you don't leave in 24 hours we're going to wipe out this house and your family. Everybody was fleeing. And the Israelis said "nobody has to leave" which is a joke, of course. How did all these strangers wind up in Israel, Jerusalem, and say this is my home, or wind up in Tel Aviv? Truman recognized the state of Israel at 3 o'clock in the morning when they knocked on his door on May 15th, 1948-this was totally, absolutely wrong. "They drove the people from their homes-they're still living in caves and tents-sixty years driven from their homes. Some Palestinians had keys to the door. The [Jewish] woman [would] open the door and say 'this is my home! Who are you, go away!' How can they [the Palestinians] tolerate that? "[Grabbing Palestinian land] is always done since they were created. Anyone with any real soul and heart knows what they've been doing is mean-you just can't take what doesn't belong to them"

Interesting Quotes by prominent Israelis…A receipe for certain failure

Jewish lobby in the UK, a fact shouldn’t take us by surprise, considering the embarrassing fact at present, that 80% of Britain’s ruling party’s MPs are members of the rabid Zionist 'Conservative Friends of Israel' (CFI).

Kissinger, US intelligence community endorse “World Without Israel

Palestine 1923 - 1948

Israeli Settlers on Occupied Palestinians Lands
Training Their Kids to Shoot Palestinians.

Peaceful Israelis !!!!!
Imagine what the main stream media would have said
if these were Muslims training their children.
It will be shown all over the world
to depict barbarian Muslims training their innocent kids
to become terrorists or born terrorist kids
to kill innocent Jews.

Israel State Terror

Who Is Really Behind the Syrian War?
Corbett Report

Understanding Modern Israel:
Why It is Driving The World Towards madness
By John Chuckman

Jewish academic Dr Agustin Velloso:

"Israel is a state that violates international law since it was established, disobeys United Nations’ resolutions, illegally occupies and colonises Arab territory, attacks defenceless civilians causing thousands of dead and injured, subjects the entire population of the Gaza Strip – more than half of whom are children – to a siege which hardly varies from that imposed by the Nazis in the concentration camps."

Henry Siegman, Leading Voice of U.S. Jewry, on Gaza:
"A Slaughter of Innocents"
A Jew with conscience and morality - Truth teller
Watch the video

Take Time to READ... It is the fountain of our wisdom.

The vow of
"The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"
that Jewish controlled media would corrupt the nations through
“an unremitting emphasis on sex.”

How the U.S. was used to create Israel
Click on the following link

Nashional summit to reasses the U.S. - Israel "Special Relationship"

The Arabs, Muslim and Christian, were promised by the British officer T.E. Lawrence (Remember Lawrence of Arabia?) independence and self-government after WWI. In the McMahon correspondence, the British promised independence to the Arabs, including the Palestinians, if they would fight against Turkey who was allied with Germany.

President Woodrow Wilson also declared that WWI was fought to make the world safe for democracy. The 12th of his Fourteen Principles for the post-war world was:

"The Turkish portions of the present Ottoman Empire should be assured a secure sovereignty, but the other nationalities which are now under Turkish rule (e.g. Arabs) should be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of autonomous development."

Had the Western world adhered to Wilson's admirable program, the Ninth Crusade against the Muslim would never have begun and there would be no war in the Middle East today. The Arab people, just released from Turkish domination, would have decided what states to create and who would rule them. They could have entered the world as democratic and prosperous nations. However, Wilson was unable to force his program on the war-mongering colonialists of Britain and France. They insisted on occupying the Arab Middle East. Instead of democracy and self-rule, the Arabs got military occupation by the Western powers. France took control of what became Lebanon and Syria, and Britain occupied what became Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine.

Lawrence promised Arabs independence from the 'hateful Ottomans', but nothing good came out of their betrayal: British, American and later Zionist colonizers shared the spoils, while the natives became even more oppressed.

Shamed by what happened to British honor, Lawrence returned his medals to the British government.

Jonas E. Alexis words:

"Jewish scholar Yuri Slezkine of the University of California postulates in his work The Jewish Century, “The modern age is the Jewish Century, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish Century.” “Modernization,” Slezkine continues, “is about everyone becoming Jewish.” Similarly, in a speech delivered at the B’nai B’rith in 1902, Solomon Ehrmann, a Viennese Jew, envisioned a future in which “All of mankind will have been jewified and joined in union with the B’nai B’rith.” When that happens, “not only the B’nai B’rith but all of Judaism will have fulfilled its task.” According Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California, for Ehrmann, “Jewification equaled enlightenment.”

The Illustrated Protocols Of Zion

By David Duke

In 1916 AD the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Arthur James Balfour prepared a letter which was issued in November 2nd, 1917 AD expressing government approval of Zionism with "The establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people". This letter is called Balfour Declaration "His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." The latter phrase has all but disappeared from the Western media and from the history of this problem.

The letter was addressed to Lord Rothschild, who was a member of the Jewish international BANKING family, and who generously offered loan after loan to the Bank of England. Nathan Rothschild was quoted: "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply." It has been said that "the wealth of Rothschild consists of the bankruptcy of nations". Edmond James Rothschild (1845 - 1934) helped to finance the establishment of Jewish communities in Palestine.

Watch: Rothschild Zionism

The Rothschild Family, half the world's wealth

The House of Rothschild by Niall Ferguson

One of the things that made the Balfour Declaration such an astonishing document and commitment was that Britain had no right of any kind to give Palestine away, in whole or in part, to anybody.

Britain with the Balfour Declaration had had no right to give away what it did not possess.

The British government, as author of the Balfour Declaration, possessed no sovereighnty or domination in Palestine enabling it to make a valid promise of any rights, whatever their nature and extent, in favour of the Jews of the world. It is immaterial whether these rights were meant to be territorial, political or cultural. On the date that the Balfour Declaration was made, Palestine formed part of Turkey, and neither its territory nor its people were under the jurisdiction of the British Government. The Declaration was void on the basis of the principle that a donor cannot give away what does not belong to him. By itself the Balfour Declaration was legally impotent.

Those responsible for drafting the Balfour Declaration had been unable to bring themselves to acknowledge the existence of the Arabs of Palestine as a people. The term "Arab" or "Arabs" did not appear in the Balfour Declaration. It reduced the 93 per cent Arab majority to "existing non-Jewish communities". That was an expression, a formula, which could only have been invented to serve a hidden agenda.

Britain played the Arab card, promising them independence after they revolted against the Turks, and having played it, Britain then betrayed the Arabs, the Arabs of Palestine most of all, and the Arabs made the mistake of trusting the British.

Britain is directly responsible for the robbery of Palestine and the Palestinian ordeal.

For Britain the promise was to maintain an "Empire", and later on, for the Americans the case was to create one.

Britain has used Zionism to further its imperial ambitions in 1917, and later on, in the mid 1950s, Americans, who were seeking merit in the idea of using Zionism to serve America's unstated but nontheless real imperial ambitions. The Zionists understood that anything the British had done, the Americans could do bigger and better.

Professor John Mearsheimer Speaks at Move Over AIPAC

American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, known as AIPAC

"AIPAC is generally regarded as one of the three most powerful lobbies in Washington. Unlike most other major lobbies, which engage on a variety of issues, AIPAC has only one objective: strengthening American support for the state of Israel through creation of a "special relationship" between the two countries. AIPAC,s support is uncritical, no matter what Israel does and no matter what the impact on the U.S. might be. Because Congress and the White House are fearful of confronting AIPAC, it enjoys a unique status. Even though it acts as a foreign lobby, it has not been required to comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Not having to register is significant, as it means that AIPAC,s sources of income and its disbursements are not a matter of public record."

Click read the article

"I Am A Zionist! You Don't Have To Be A Jew To Be A Zionist!"
Joe Biden, US Vic President

But recently, 2012, America is Planning for a Post-Israel Middle East.....

Read the Article

AIPAC: The Voice of America

Congress is already "Israeli-occupied territory"

Watch Israel Domination over USA

In the early 1960s, Senator William J. Fulbright fought to force the American Zionist Council to register as agents of a foreign government. The Council eluded registration by reorganizing as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC has since become what Fulbright most feared: a foreign agent dominating American foreign policy while disguised as a domestic lobby.

"Stephen Sniegoski has had the persistence to ferret out mountains of impossible-to-challenge evidence that this Israel-U.S. connection is the driving force behind virtually all Middle East decisionmaking over the last eight years, as well as the political courage to write a book about it.

Sniegoski's new book (The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel) demonstrates clearly how U.S. and Israeli policies and actions with respect to Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the other Gulf states, and even most recently Georgia are all tied together in a bundle of interrelated linkages, each of which affects all the others. The right wing of Israeli politics, the neoconservatives in the U.S. who strongly support Israel, and the aging attachedIsrael Lobby in the United States all have worked together, and are still doing so, to bring about more wars, regime changes, and instability, specifically the fragmentation of any Middle Eastern states that might ever conceivably threaten Israel.

In addition, one purpose of such wars and other changes is explicitly to intensify the discouragement of Palestinians as the latter�s potential allies are knocked off one by one, making it easier for Israel, over time, to finish off the Palestinians."

"In the U.S.,the principal governmental architects of the war, the intellectual promoters of the war, their publicly enunciated published strategies for the war were all deeply attached to the Israel Lobby and worked for the Israeli state. Wolfowitz, number 2 in the Pentagon, Douglas Feith, number 3 in the Pentagon, Richard Perle, head of the Defense Board, Elliot Abrams in charge of Middle East affairs for the National Security Council, and dozens of other key operatives in the government and ideologues in the mass media were life-long fanatical activists in favor of Israel, some of whom had lost security clearances in previous administrations for handing over documents to the Israeli government..."

Kourosh Ziabari: Why is the Israeli lobby so powerful, influential and authoritative? Almost all of the major media conglomerates in the United States own to well-off Jews who are committed to maintaining the interests of the state of Israel in the U.S. Some experts say that Israel is the representative of the United States in the Middle East region, but some others suggest that it's Israel which determines the future of political developments in the United States. What's your take on that?

Philip Giraldi: The Israel Lobby is so powerful because it deliberately set out to establish control over key elements in the United States. It has demonstrated a number of times that politicians who are perceived as being unfriendly to Israel will face serious problems in being reelected because the Lobby mobilizes to provide money and media support to opponents. This means that congress is afraid to oppose anything that Israel and its Lobby wants. The same holds true for the presidency. Every presidential candidate must be seen as friendly to Israel or he will be attacked in the media and denied millions of dollars in political contributions, making it a safer option to support Israel. Finally, pro-Israeli interests control much of the media and, more important, dominate the opinion and editorial pages, making the only narrative that most Americans hear about the Middle East highly favorable to Israel and highly critical of all Israel's enemies. As a result, Israel is able to control U.S. foreign policy as it relates to the Middle East and also much of the Muslim world.

Former US Secretary of State James Baker uttered his infamous remark about Israel�s Jewish American supporters: �Fuck the Jews, they don�t even vote for us.�

Usrael: These are the leaders of
the greatest country on earth (Video)

PMR Congressman Jim Traficant talks about Jewish control of America

In an interview with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren in September, 2009,[13] Jim Traficant said he was the top target of AIPAC and the U.S. Justice Department. On the subject of Israel, he stated: They [Israel] are controlling much of our foreign policy. They're influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They've pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran. We're conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody's afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress.

There was also a particular strategic consideration which played a part in motivating Britain to issue the Balfour Declaration. It was the need to protect the Suez Canal, which was vital for the maintenence of "the spinal cord" of the British Empire. Weizmann in his book "Trial and Error" recalled a conversation he had on the subject of the Canal with Lord Robert Cecil, British's assistant secretary of state for foreign affairs. He said: "Jewish Palestine would be a safeguard to England, in particular in respect to the Suez Canal."

Edwin Samuel Montagu - the only Jewish Englishman in the British cabinet and Secretary of State for India - issued a memorandum marked SECRET and dated 23 August 1917, insisting that any declaration Balfour might make had to contain safeguards for the rights of the Arabs in Palestine. Montagu was a passionate anti-Zionist and lead the fight against the creation of a Jewish state. Montagu's memorandum was not de-classified, not considered to be fit for public consumption, until 1970. It was suppressed for more than half a century. Montagu said: "Zionism has always seemed to me to be a mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom."

Another quote from Montagu:

I would willingly disenfranchise every Zionist. I woud almost be tempted to proscribe the Zionist Organization as illegal and against the national interests....

On March 5, 1919 the New York Times revealed that 30 of the most prominent and outstanding Jewish Americans had signed a petition to President Wilson. It was a fiercely anti-Zionist petition. In their petition the anti-Zionist Jewish Americans warned against any U.S. commitment "now or in the future to Jewish territorial soverienty in Palestine." Such a demand, the anti-Zionists said, "not only misrepresented the trend of the history of the Jews who ceased to be a nation 2,000 years ago, but involves the limitation and possible annulment of the larger claim of Jews for full citizenship and human rights in all lands in which those human rights are not yet secure."

The anti-Zionist petition to President Wilson contained this statement:

" It is not true that Palestine is the national home of the Jewish people, and of no other people... To subject Jews to the possible recurrence of such bitter and sanguinary conflicts, which would be inevitable, would be a crime against the triumph of their whole past history and against the lofty and world-embracing visions of their great prophets and leaders... Whether the Jews be regarded as a 'race' or as a religion, it is contrary to democratic principles for which the World War was waged to found a nation on either or both of these bases."

President Wilson appointed King-Crane commission of inquiry in Palestine. On the subject of the Balfour Declaration, King and Crane wrote this: "A national home is not equivalent to making Palestine into a Jewish state nor can the erection of such a Jewish state be accomplished without the graveest trespass upon the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities."

On 2 October, 1919 President Wilson suffered a thrombosis, a stroke, and was incapacitated.

Balfour himself said in a memorandum on 11 August 1919 which was prepared for the Paris Peace Conference:

"In Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country... The four great powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age long tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land."

Mayer Amshel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild fortune, at the time of his death in 1812, created a trust of his estate, by will, for the elevation of the Jewish race and the establishment of a Jewish World Empire. The estate has been preserved and managed since his death as a unit in pursuance of the provisions of his will.

The Rothschild family commission biographies give the illusion that their fortune has dwindled but researchers estimate their wealth as close to 500 trillion Dollars, i.e. more than half the wealth of the entire world.

Arthur Koestler wrote that in the letter "one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third." More than that, the country was still part of the Empire of a fourth, namely Turkey."

Watch: Fatal Embrace by Mark Braverman (a Jew),
a short video

David Hirst, commenting on the vagueness of the Balfour Declaration, says that

"The document bears Balfour's name, but in reality it was the Zionists themselves who, in very large measure, both inspired the Declaration and framed its text. It must be reckoned the finest flower of Zionist diplomacy at its most sophisticatedly ambivalent....suffice it to say here... that the Zionists who framed the declaration saw in it the charter of a future Jewish state..."

If, as the Israelis insist, that "national home" was actually become a state of Israel, then the intention of the Declaration was to create two states in Palestine, one Jewish and one non-Jewish. Some 85 years later the latter state has still not come into existence.

Winston Churchill wrote in 1920 immediately following his assertion that Bolshevism is led and initiated mostly by Jews:

"But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our life time by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire"

I quote Uri Avnery (April 9, 03 article):

"The Balfour declaration of 1917, that promised the Jews a homeland in Palestine, had two parents. The mother was Christian Zionism (among whose adherents were illustrious statesmen like Lord Palmerston and Lord Shaftesbury, long before the foundation of the Zionist movement), the father was British imperialism. The Zionist idea allowed the British to crowd out their French competitors and take possession of Palestine, which was needed to safeguard the Suez Canal and the shorter sea route to India."

The most preposterous Zionist slogan from the early days was to describe Palestine as "a land without people for a people without land." This was propagated by irresponsible journalists who should have ridiculed it whenever they mentioned it. Obviously that land was inhabited by a great many people, including quite a few who were Jews.

Golda Meir, the Israeli Prime Minister, considered by Israelis as a great leader and by others as one of history's great killers, disputed the facts and said: "It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine and we came and threw them out and took their country away from them. They did not exist."

A quote from Robert John's Paper Presented to the Fifth International Revisionist Conference titled: Behind the Balfour Declaration:
Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild

"The Balfour Declaration may be the most extraordinary document produced by any Government in world history. It took the form of a letter from the Government of His Britannic Majesty King George the Fifth, the Government of the largest empire the world has ever known, on which -- once upon a time -- the sun never set; a letter to an international financier of the banking house of Rothschild who had been made a peer of the realm."

Congressman Louis T. McFadden who, for more than ten years, served as chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee, stated that the international bankers are a "dark crew of financial pirates who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket... They prey upon the people of these United States."

Arthur Koestler wrote that in the letter (Balfour Declaration):

one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third. More than that, the country was still part of the Empire of a fourth, namely Turkey.

"To the Arabs, the Balfour Declaration was a betrayal of Arab nationalism and, while promising to protect their rights, was simply an attempt to legitimize Jewish political domination over Palestine in complete disregard to the numerical superiority of the Arabs and the Wilsonian principles of majority rule and self-determination".

Before the Europeans went to World War I the guiding principles of the foreign policy President Wilson wanted to pursue were these: a refusal to exert America's material power against weaker nations; a belief that the rights and interests of small nations should be respected; and the view that peoples then dominated by the big European powers should be set on the road to self-determination. Woodrow Wilson was a man of many abilities who wanted to use the power of the presidency to change the world for the better; and who really believed that doing so was a mission impossible. Wilson was a political scientist and historian and received his Ph.D. after advanced studies in government and history at the Johns Hopkins university.

But President Wilson failed. Whether the retreat would have happened if President Wilson had not suffered a stroke at a critical moment is a good question.

Because of that failure America would become with time the leading supporter of Israel right or wrong; a fact of international life that allowed the Zionist state to behave without regard for international law and, along the way, to pursue, with an arrogance to match its overwhelming military might, expansionist policies which heaped humiliation after humiliation upon all Arabs and the entire Moslem world. The phenomenon of Anti-Americanism has its origins in America's retreat from the moral high ground in 1919.

In December 1917 during World War I the British General Sir Edmund Allenby, with the help of the Arab Revolt against the Turkish rulers, captured Jerusalem from the Turks, and by October 1918 occupied the rest of Palestine. Relying on British assurances and promises, given by Lawrence the Arabs had no doubt that their sacrifices and military successes would justify Britain's recognition and support of Arab nationalism. At the same time the British wanted to use the Jews as a wedge against France and split the Arab Nation by creating a British Mandate over Palestine (and later creating the State of Israel). The Mandate violated the sovereignty of the people of Palestine and their natural rights of independence and self-determination. Palestine was the national home of the Palestinians from time immemorial. The establishment of a national home there for an alien people was a violation of the legitimate and fundamental rights of the Palesinian inhabitants.

In Britain the House of Lords opposed the incorporation of the Balfour Declaration in the Mandate. On 21 June 1922 there was a debate in that House on a motion declaring the Mandate to be unacceptable in its present form-i.e. because it did incorporate the Balfour Declaration. Speaking for the motion, Lord Islington said that in its existing form the Mandate directly violated the pledges made by His Majesty's Government to the people of Palestine. In the course of his prophetic speech he said the following: "In fact, very many orthodox Jews, not only in Palestine but all over the world, view with the deepest misapprehension, not to say dislike, this principle of a Zionist home in Palestine...The scheme of Zionist Home seeks to make Zionist political predominance effective in Palestine by importing into the country extraneous and alien Jews from other parts of the world...It is literally inviting subsequent catastrophe...What we have done, by concession, not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is starting a running sore in the East, and no one can tell how far that sore will extend." Lord Islington had pointed out that the Mandate's provisions concerning the establishment of a Jewish national home were inconsistent with Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 22 was of supreme importance because it was the one that defined the basic objective of the Mandate system. It was to assure "the well-being and development" of the peoples inhabiting the Mandated territories; an objective described by Article 22 as forming "a sacred trust of civilisation." Lord Islington addressed the House of Lords and said: "When one sees in Article 22... that the well-being and development of such peoples should form a sacred trust of civilisation, and when one takes that as the keynote of the Mandatory system, I think your Lordship will see that we are straying down a very far path when we are postponing self-government in Palestine until such time as the population is flooded with an alien race."

The Arabs were disappointed and betrayed with the breaking of British promises, Sykes-Picot Agreement: 1916. Lawrence expressed his shame at dealing with the Arabs under false pretenses and returned all the medals and decorations he was awarded. His famous book , Seven Pillars of Wisdom, A Triumph , is a must read.

Lawrence of Arabia

The country became a British Mandate until 1948.

The British made their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of the object. For the British Palestine was a strategic point on the land and sea routes to India (The Crown Jewel at that time) and, above all, as the terminus at the Mediterranean Sea of pipelines from rich oil-bearing regions of the Middle East. The establishment of a Zionist Jewish State under the British protection would give Britain their coveted prize and apparently implementing the Allied slogan of "Self determination of small nations". In 1922 "The Declaration" was embodied in the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine.

The Palestinians rejected British right to promise their country to a third party.

The British allowed Jewish immigration to Palestine from all over the world. The Jews (Sephardim and Mezrahim Jews) in Palestine before the British Mandate formed 5 % of the population of Palestine and lived harmoniously with the Arabs before the appearance of The Zionist Organization. And 95 % were Arabs living there for thousands of years.

The view that the conflict is religious and that it has been ongoing for thousands of years is inaccurate. For approximately 2000 years Jews and Arabs enjoyed a harmonious relation, and for four hundred years up until World War I, as citizens of the Ottoman empire with equal rights. Indeed, Jews enjoyed high government position within the Ottoman Empire.

Before the 20th century, most Jews in Palestine belonged to old Yishuv, or community, that had settled more for religious than for political reasons. There was little if any conflict between them and the Arab population. It should be remembered that for 1400 years, while European Jews saw pogroms, the Inquisition and the Holocaust, Jews were not persecuted in Muslim countries and, indeed, for long periods in Spain and elsewhere, were partners in a marvelous Muslim-Jewish symbiosis. Tensions began after the first Zionist settlers arrived in the 1880's...when [they] purchased land from absentee Arab owners, leading to dispossession of the peasants who had cultivated it.

Jews United Against Zionism:
"We seek the return of all Palestinian refugees to their rightful land.
We seek to live in the land of Palestine as anti Zionist Jews. To reside as loyal and peaceful Palestinian citizens, in peace and harmony with our Muslim Brethren. Just as our ancestors lived in Palestine for centuries before the usurpations of this tragic century."

"The indigenous Jews of Palestine also reacted negatively to Zionism. They did not see the need for a Jewish state in Palestine and did not want to exacerbate relations with the Arabs"....John Quigley: "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

The modern state of Israel is NOT comprised of the descendants of Abraham; in fact, they are primarily descendants of the Khazars whose ancestors are thought to be of Asian or Turkish origin. The majority of immigrants came from Central and East Europe and USSR (Ashkenazi Jews). The forefathers of the new immigrants were not of Semitic origin and never existed on the Palestinian Land and therefore have no claim for Palestine (The Promised Land !). The term anti-Semitism makes no sense at all, for the Arabs are also Semites, so should hardly be accused of anti-Semitism. What the Palestinians could not understand or accept was why their land had been chosen to deal with the age-old problem of anti-Jewish prejudice, discrimination, supremacyion, and extermination in the Holocaust in Europe, in the countries of Western, Central and Eastern Europe. What the Palestinians asked was, why are we being forced to pay the price for this persecution of Jews in Europe? The easy answer is because the Jewish national movement, Zionism, chose to establish its state in Palestine, and the European powers concurred in that wish.

Only Sephardic Jews can claim that they probably descend from the Old Testament Semitic Hebrews. And Sephardic Jews make up only a small minority and, more important, have a relatively low representation and influence within Jewish power structures, both in Israel and in the Diaspora.

The greater part of Jews in Israel, as well as in the United States, Europe and Argentina are of mostly of Ashkenazim origin.

Ashkenazim Jews' for the most part blond, light-eyed, white-skinned and often red-headed (those subscribing to M. de Gobineau's out-dated theories would call them true 'Aryans', no doubt) have little or nothing to do with the Hebrews and Israelites of the Bible. I.e., they have little or no 'Semitic' blood running through their veins, and thus little or no historical or ethnic justification to claim as their own, the Holy Land of Palestine.

A Quotation From An Article
Terrifying Nightmare
By Alan Hart

"February 12, 2010 - Most Jews of the world (and probably many Gentiles) believe that Zionism is the return of Jews to the land promised to them by God. At the risk of offending some readers of all faiths for saying so, I must confess, and do so cheerfully, that I don�t buy this concept because the Gentile me does not believe in the God of organized, institutional religions. So, I say to myself, no God, no promise to Jews (or anybody else). In my perception of the scheme of things, God is the potential for good inside each and every one of us. God so defined is a prisoner within each of us and our prime task is to liberate this prisoner. But let�s put that to one side.

The Jews who �returned� in answer to Zionism�s call had no biological connection to the ancient Hebrews. They were converts to Judaism long after the end of the Hebrew conquest and short-lived domination of much of Canaan, the name as in the Bible by which Palestine was first known to the world. They therefore had no legitimate claim on the land.

Zionism asserts that its state was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the UN Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. That is propaganda nonsense. The truth can be summarized as follows:

In the first place the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestine did not have the right to decide to partition Palestine or assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.

By the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly did pass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a recommendation - meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.

The General Assembly's recommendation never went to the Security Council for consideration because the U.S. knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force given the extent of Arab and other Muslim opposition to it; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.

So the partition plan was vitiated (became invalid) and the question of what the hell to do about Palestine - after Britain had made a mess of it and walked away, effectively surrendering to Zionist terrorism - was taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the U.S. was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence - actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.

The truth of the time was that the Zionist state had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist UNLESS � Unless it was recognised and legitimized by those Zionism had dispossessed of their land and their rights. In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved."

Winston Churchill: "In 1956 Churchill told President Eisenhower, "I am, of course, a Zionist, and have been ever since the Balfour Declaration." ( Herbert Mitgang, "The Official Churchill in One Volume," N.Y. Times, Nov. 6, 1991)."

The Zionists promptly seized upon the Balfour Declaration as justification for its intent to establish a completely Jewish State in Palestine. Among other claims it announced that "Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English."

Aquote from: Oren Ben-Dor

(Israeli citizen who teaches the philosophy of law
and political philosophy at University of Southampton)
Published: 26 July 2006 The Independent

Who are the real terrorists in the Middle East?

"The very creation of Israel required an act of terror. In 1948, most of the non-Jewish indigenous people were ethnically cleansed from the part of Palestine which became Israel. This action was carefully planned. Without it, no state with a Jewish majority and character would have been possible.

Since 1948, the "Israeli Arabs", those Palestinians who avoided expulsion, have suffered continuous discrimination. Indeed, many have been internally displaced, ostensibly for "security reasons", but really to acquire their lands for Jews.

Surely Holocaust memory and Jewish longing for Eretz Israel would not be sufficient to justify ethnic cleansing and ethnocracy? To avoid the destabilization that would result from ethical inquiry, the Israeli state must hide the core problem, by nourishing a victim mentality among Israeli Jews.

Jews today have a strong influence on the most powerful country in the world, and the Holocaust played an important role in the establishment of the State of Israel."

The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves, had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. It arose in the late 19th century and in 1897 Theodor Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew who worked as a journalist and playwright in Vienna, the capital of Austro-Hungarian Empire, organized the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland, and founded a permanent World Zionist Organization.

Sultan Abdulhamid of the Ottoman Empire, who ruled the Middle East until 1918 rejected Herzl's request to give Palestine a homeland for the Jews. The following is his rejection letter.

No wonder Albert Einstein objected to the establishment of the State of Israel when Truman gave Israel the go-ahead. Albert also turned down the offer to be president of Israel and the Likud Party was branded by prominent US Jews as being Racist, Fascist and Superstitious.

Albert Einstein, Sidney Hook, Hannah Arendt and twenty-five other prominent Jews, in a letter to The New York Times (December 4, 1948), condemned Menachem Begin's and Yitzhak Shamir's Likud party as "fascist" and espousing "an admixture of ultra-nationalism, religious mysticism and racial superiority." The same theme is echoed in William Zukerman's 1934 article in The Nation, "The Menace of Jewish Fascism. " This is also the premise of Michael Selzer's book, The Aryanization of the Jewish State.

"That biblical promise is Israel's only claim to legitimacy. But whatever God meant when he promised Abraham that "unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the Euphrates," it is doubtful that he intended it to be used as an excuse to take by force and chicanery a land lawfully inhabited and owned by others."

"Compared to the power of this myth, does it really matter that the Exodus from Egypt never took place? Thousands of Egyptian documents deciphered in recent years leave no room for doubt: the exodus of masses of people, as described in the Bible, or anything remotely like it, just never happened. These documents, which cover in the finest detail every period and every part of Canaan during this epoch prove beyond any doubt that there was no "Conquest of Canaan" and no kingdom of David and Solomon. For a hundred years, Zionist archeologists have devoted tireless efforts to finding even a single piece of evidence to support the Biblical narrative, all to no avail."

Instead of a history text,
Jews have the Holocaust,
an event that matured into a religion.

The Words of Gilad Atzmon:

"The new Jewish religion preaches revenge. It even establishes a new Jewish God. Instead of old Yehova, the new Jewish God is 'the Jew' himself: the brave and witty being, the one who survived the ultimate and most sinister genocide, the one who came out of the ashes and stepped forward into a new beginning."

The Biblical law that God will not allow a disobedient Jewish nation to dwell in Palestine is one of the most emphasized doctrines of the Old Testament. It is stated in the clearest language more than two dozen times in Leviticus and Deuteronomy alone! Nowhere does the Bible hint that Jews can return as a nation in unrighteousness, as they did during the 20th century.

Remember the word that Thou didst command Thy servant Moses, saying, If you are unfaithful, I will scatter you among the peoples; but if you return to Me and keep My commandments and do them, though those of you who have been scattered were in the most remote parts of the heavens, I will gather them there and will bring them to the place where I have chosen to cause My name to dwell." (Neh. 1:9

Thus, disobedient Jews can neither own Palestine nor lawfully occupy it.

Rev. Ted Pike

"For the past century, most evangelical Christians and religious Jews have agreed that national return of Jews to Palestine is the will of God. They believed it fulfills abundant Old Testament prophecies. But what does the Old Testament really say? Many passages flatly state that Israel can't inhabit the land except in obedience to God. (1) For Jews to dwell in His holy land, God expects them to practice righteousness and mercy, even to Palestinians.

Israel has ruthlessly mistreated the Palestinians, both Muslim and Christian, expelling 800,000 of them in 1948 through terror. Original Zionist terrorism is the predominant cause of international Arab terrorism. This record strongly argues that Israel has still not met God's moral requirements. (2) Such requirements were satisfied by holy men of God whom God permitted to enter Canaan' Hebrew saints like Caleb, Joshua, Ezra, and Nehemiah. God told Abraham He would deliver the covenant blessings He promised (including rights to occupy the land) only if Abraham's descendants performed these same righteous works. (Gen. 18:19)

How can God approve of Israel's return when she does the opposite of righteous Abraham?"

Endnotes:

1. These passages include Lev. 18:28, 26:27-34, Deut. 1:7, 1:37, 4:26, 6:18, 7:12, 28:58-64, Ezek. 13:9, Jer. 29:13.

2. The mass exodus of Arabs in 1948 was precipitated by slaughter of about 250 innocent Arab men, women, and children at Deir Yassin by later prime minister Menachim Begin's Urgun terrorists. For full details, go to The Simple Explanation for Mid-East Strife.

I refer to a book "The Bible Unearthed: Archeology's New Version of Ancient Israel and the Origin of its Sacred Texts". The authors are Israel Finkelstein, director of an archaeological institute at Tel Aviv University, and Neil Asher Silberman, director of a Belgian archaeological institute. They found that the "great" Jewish kingdom existed in something like their fabled extent for a tiny fraction of the period traditionally alleged. Their boundaries never came close to the "Greater Israel" of contemporary Jewish fundamentalism. The rest of the time, Judah and Israel are thought to have been, for the most part, very primitive entities, devoid of literate culture or substantial administrative structure, extending to only a small, landlocked part of what is now called Palestine. The great structure of the Biblical era are, all of them, attributed to Canaanite cultures. The authors refer to the Biblical kingdom at its greatest extent as a "multi-ethnic society." The idea that such a past could validate a Jewish historical claim to Palestine is simply ludicrous, even if it could be shown-which it cannot- that today's Jews are in some legal sense, heirs to the ancient Israelite kingdoms.

Beyond Chutzpah:
On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism
and the Abuse of History
A book By Norman G. Finkelstein
Editorial Reviews From Publishers Weekly:

"Finkelstein, a political science professor and author of The Holocaust Industry: "Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, has conducted a rancorous public feud with Harvard Law professor and pro-Israel stalwart Alan Dershowitz over the latter's The Case for Israel, and here expands his arguments into a vigorous polemic on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The first part of the book examines what he feels is a growing tendency of pro-Israel commentators to use spurious charges of anti-Semitism to deflect and discredit legitimate criticism of Israel. The second, much longer, part is a line-by-line debunking of The Case for Israel, which he compares to Communist apologetics for Stalinist Russia. Rebutting Dershowitz's claims about Israel's "superb" human rights record, Finkelstein cites human rights organizations like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Israeli group B'Tselem to document Israeli abuses in the occupied territories, including killings of Palestinian civilians, torture of Palestinian prisoners and home demolitions. Lengthy appendices flesh out his explosive assertion that Dershowitz plagiarized the historical research and interpretations (but not the actual phrasing) of Joan Peters's From Time Immemorial. The Middle East conflict rarely inspires calm discussion, and Finkelstein duly pillories his opponents as perpetrators of "hoax" and "fraud" who lack "ordinary moral values" and whose behavior resembles anti-Semitic stereotypes. Inflammatory rhetoric aside, he does raise serious questions about the veracity, scholarly methods and fairness of Dershowitz and others. More important, he presents a wealth of evidence on the human rights situation in the occupied territories, so often ignored in American debate on these issues.

Exhaustively researched and meticulously-if intemperately-argued, Finkelstein's book is a formidable challenge to the conventional wisdom on the Middle East."

CrossTalk: Farewell Israel? (ft. Norman Finkelstein)

Norman Finkelstein's new book on the American Jewish community has been both widely praised and criticized by influential writers. So is the American-Jewish romance with Israel coming to an end? Are the American Jews known for their liberal views distancing themselves from Israel? Or is it simply an overstatement? Do they support the current Israeli policies? Does the Israeli lobby represent their views? And do they have a strong connection to the Holy Land? CT-ing with Norman Finkelstein, Daniel Pollak and Mouin Rabbani.

"Zionism today is the real enemy of the Jews"

The debate was organized by intelligence (the London Forum for Live Debate) sponsored by the Evening Standard - a local London newspaper. It was chaired by Richard Lindley, a veteran television reporter for ITN and the BBC.

A growing group of Jewish Israeli professors is challenging the legitimacy of the Israeli state from within. Many are Mizrahim, as the Sephardi Jews from the Middle East and North Africa are increasingly called, and do so from a distinctly Mizrahi outlook. In July 2004, for example, a poem appeared online entitled,

"I Am an Arab Refugee":

When I hear Fayruz singing,
"I shall never forget thee, Palestine,"
I swear to you with my right hand
that at once I am a Palestinian.
All of a sudden I know:
I am an Arab refugee
and, if not,
let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth.

The author is not a Palestinian refugee but rather an Israeli Jew. His name is Sami Shalom Chetrit, a Mizrahi professor at Hebrew University in Jerusalem who, along with Mizrahi academics like Ella Shohat, Eli Avraham, Oren Yiftachel, Yehouda Shenhav, Pnina Motzafi-Haller and others has developed a radical critique of ethnic relations in Israel.

True to post-Zionism, an intellectual movement that believes that Zionism lacks moral validity, post-Zionist Mizrahi writers believe that Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state. According to Mizrahi post-Zionism, the Mizrahim, about half of Israel's Jewish population, are "Arab-Jews," who like the Palestinians are victims of Zionism.

Israel's claims to be a democracy are hollow hypocrisy. Modern Israel is a pilot project for the New Order to be imposed on the world. It is a paradise for the rich and a total misery for lesser folk, including native Arab Muslims and Christians and even many Jews who do not belong to the Ashkenazim elite, but to 'inferior/ orders of Sephardic, Ethiopian, and Russian Jews.

Britain's high commissioner for Palestine, John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. He said: "all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jews without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators..." The colonial office rejected the recommendation.

The distortion of the intent and meaning of the Balfour Declaration caused the British to issue its "White Paper" in 1939. It stated emphatically and unequivocally: "His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish state against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish state might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922, which reads as follows..."

Acknowledging that the 1922 Whie Paper had not removed Arab doubts about Britain's policy, the 1939 White Paper then said:

"His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish state." The Zionists rejected the "White Paper".

The Jews were growing in number with the help of Britain. Large scale Jewish settlements began during the British Mandatory period and continued growing in number. The World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency for Palestine raised funds abroad and recruited Jewish immigration through the help and support from the Western Governments. The prospect of a Jewish state, therefore, posed a mortal threat to the Palestinians, a prospect of ethnic subjugation and very likely of what is now called ethnic cleansing. As a result Arab opposition to British rule and to Zionism grew. Arab uprising culminated in a general revolt (1936 - 39) and was suppressed by British troops on the eve of World War II.

In 1942 the Zionists began an all-out terrorist campaign intended to drive the British out of Palestine. The Terrorist campaign succeeded and caused the British to surrender its "League of Nations Mandate" over Palestine to the United Nations.

During World War II illegal Jewish immigration increased and the Zionist movements started revolting against the British Mandate to take over all Palestine.

In 1947 Britain decided to leave Palestine and called on the UN to make recommendations. The UN in Nov. 29, 1947 adopted a plan calling for partition of Palestine into Arab and Jewish states "Partition Plan".

The plan suggested two separate independent sovereign states, one Jewish with a population of 450,000 and allotted 55 percent of the land and a Palestinian state, with a population of 1,300,000 allotted 45 percent of the land. The plan was more than fair to the Jews then residing in Palestine but very unfair to the Arab Palestinians, Christians and Muslims, then living there. The Jewish population was approximately one-third of the total of inhabitants, and the land then owned by Jews comprised about 6 percent of the total land area. Yet the Partition Plan awarded about 55 percent of the territory to the prospective Jewish state. Thus it is not surprising that the Arabs rejected the plan, and when Israel declared its independence in 1948 they invaded Palestine with military forces and tried to overturn the result.

When British imperialism retreated from Palestine, it left behind not an independent secular republic, but a new colonial-settler regime. In that sense, the State of Israel, proclaimed on May 15, 1948, is the direct heir of the colonial British Mandate regime made possible by Allenby's conquest of Ottoman Palestine. Unlike other former British colonies, Palestine never underwent de-colonization and democratization. Thanks to Partition Plan, colonialism was reorganized in Palestine, and took a new form: the State of Israel.

Partition was supported by the democratic imperialist United States and by the counter-revolutionary Stalinist Soviet Union, and both supported the Zionist Yishuv's unilateral Proclamation of statehood, So did their respective satellites and allies. The majority of the members of the United Nations General Assembly fell into line. The people of Palestine were left alone to face the Zionist onslaught, poorly organized, poorly armed, poorly led, and lacking a democratic revolutionary political program.

Late Prince Faisal of SA addressing the UN Assembly.
Later he became king of Saudi Arabia,
and was later assassinated
after oil embargo he imposed "in response to the U.S.
decision to re-supply the Israeli military
during the (October War between
Egypt & Israel), Yom Kippur war:

"If you want to be generous, then be generous out of what you possess", declared Prince Faisal bin Abdul Aziz, head of the Saudi delegation to the United Nations General Assembly in 1947. Faisal expressed astonishment that members of the US Congress, who were at that moment resisting the entry of Jewish and other European refugees into their own country, should be urging, uncontrolled and unconditional immigration into Palestine as if that country had no owners and as if her rightful inhabitants had no say in the matter.

Quotation:

"The United Nations was created after two world wars, mainly to solve world conflicts and to put an end to the law of the jungle, Might is Right. Unfortunately, it ended up being exactly that, but in a more sophisticated and structured style. That in itself, leads to the loss of the credibility and the raison d'etre of the UN. We have watched along the years how the five nations of the security council have strangled the role of the united nations by the veto power that each of those nations granted to themselves, thus enabling them to defy the general consensus of the whole international community. Is this democracy? Is this fair? Is this the just tool that the UN needs to solve world conflicts?"

The partition plan was rejected by the Arabs and there was full scale civil war. The UN sent in a mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, who in turn was assassinated by Jewish terrorists.

The mastermind, the one who tatgeted Bernadotte and sanctioned his murder, was Stern Gang's director of operations, Yitzhak Shamir, who, when he emerged from the shadows many years later, would become Begin's foreign minister and then his successor as prime minister.

Bernadotte's insistence that Israel had to allow the Palestinian refugees to return to their homes did not die with him. It was enshrined in another resolution of the UN General Assembly-number 194 of 11 December 1948. It was to become famous on account of Israel's contempt for it:

"The General Assembly of the United Nations" Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live in peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of, or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible."

For a particular purpose Israel said it would accept its obligations as set down in UN resolutions, including 194; but, as events were to prove, it had absolutely no intention of doing so.

The Zionist pressure on the White House and the United Nations is revealed in President Truman's Memoirs:

"The facts were that not only were there pressure movements around the United Nations unlike anything that had been there before, but the White House too was subjected to a constant barrage. I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The pressure of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders - actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats - disturbed and annoyed me. Some were even suggesting that we pressure sovereign nations into favourable votes in the General Assembly. I have never approved of the practice of the strong imposing their will on the weak whether among men or among nations."

"In advising President Harry Truman against recognition of this extremist enclave as a legitimate state, the Joint Chiefs detailed the Zionists' "fanatical concepts" including their plans for "military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East." Our military was correct.

Facing a decline in his approval ratings and bare campaign coffers in the lead-up to his 1948 presidential race, Truman put his signature on a two-sentence note that on May 14th extended what the Zionists sought: U.S. recognition. That decision began a "special relationship" that has proven consistently harmful to U.S. interests.

The Truman campaign train was then "refueled" with $400,000 from grateful Zionists ($3.6 million in 2010 dollars). As editorial support from pro-Israeli media shifted in Truman's favor, his approval surged long enough for him to prevail in November over New York's Tom Dewey.

Absent the Holocaust, Truman could not have recognized Zionism as a lawful basis for a sovereign state in Palestine over intense opposition from Secretary of State George Marshall, the Pentagon, the State Department Policy Planning staff and the Central Intelligence Agency. All were adamantly opposed, as were members of the U.S. diplomatic corps. They knew better."

The Truman-Marshall argument over Israel has entered American lore - and been a subject of widespread historical controversy.

Was Marshall's opposition to recognition of Israel a reflection of his, and the American establishment's, latent anti-Semitism?

Or was it a credible reflection of U.S. military worries that the creation of Israel would engage America in a defense of the small country that would drain American resources and lives?

While the politics of campaign finance clearly played a role, Truman also acted out of humanitarian and religious concerns informed by his Christian Zionist upbringing in rural Missouri where he famously read the Bible cover-to-cover five times by age 15. His decision was also shaped by sentiments developed as a youngster steeped in a fundamentalist Baptist theology that revered the Jews' 'return to Zion' as a prerequisite for the return of the Christian messiah.

The way in which Jews built their power base in the American financial and then cultural and political spheres has been well documented by various American Historians. It is a process extending over decades since the late 19th century which includes the foundation of the Federal Reserve Board by agents of the great Rothschild and Warburg European dynasties (Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb etc...), the consolidation of the Hollywood industry under Jewish-led studios etc...

Every man, woman and child in Israel gets a $14,000/year pension from the U.S. taxpayer. This from a nation that can't give its people single payer health care and pays for 800 military bases around the world and bails out the bankers and not the poor citizen who was robbed AND fights trillion dollar wars that benefit no one...

Between 2009-2018, the United States is scheduled to give Israel--the largest recipient of U.S. aid--$30 billion in military aid. Through its illegal 42-year military occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip, Israel misuses U.S. weapons in violation of U.S. law to kill and injure Palestinian civilians, destroy Palestinian civilian infrastructure, blockade the Gaza Strip, and build illegal settlements in West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Most of the Zionist Movement accepted the partition resolution, convinced that the crucial issue was to establish a firm foundation for Jewish Sovereignty. In closed meetings, David Ben-Gurion never concealed his intention to expand at the first opportunity, the territory given to the Jews. That is why Israel's Declaration of Independence did not define the state's borders and Isreal has not defined its borders to this day.

The Arab World did not accept the Partition Plan and regarded it as a vile attempt by the United Nations, which at the time was essentially a club of Western and Communist Nations, to divide a country that did not belong to it. Handling over more than half of the country to the Jewish minority made it all the more unforgivable in their eyes.

In the first place the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestine did not have the right to decide to partition Palestine or assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.

Despite that, by the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly did pass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council. The truth is that the General Assembly's partition proposal never went to the Security Council for consideration. Why not? Because the U.S. knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force given the extent of Arab and other Muslim opposition to it; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.

So the partition plan was vitiated (became invalid) and the question of what the hell to do about Palestine after Britain had made a mess of it and walked away, effectively surrendering to Zionist terrorism was taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the U.S. was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.

The truth of the time was that the Zionist state, which came into being mainly as a consequence of pre-planned ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist UNLESS Unless it was recognised and legitimized by those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state. In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved. And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not and cannot take from the Palestinians by force..

The Old Testament and the Genocide (Excerpts):

"You will chase your enemies, and they shall fall by the sword before you. Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight; your enemies shall fall by the sword before you." Leviticus, Chapter 26, verses 7-9

"When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them and show them no mercy." Deuteronomy 7:1-2,

"Do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them as the Lord your God has commanded you" Deuteronomy 20:16

There is not much doubt amongst Biblical scholars that the Hebrew Bible contains some highly charged non-ethical suggestions, some of which are no less than a call for a genocide. Biblical scholar Raymund Schwager has found in the Old Testament 600 passages of explicit violence, 1000 descriptive verses of God's own violent actions of punishment, 100 passages where God expressly commands others to kill people. Apparently, violence is the most often mentioned activity in the Hebrew Bible.

Britain, having decided to hand over the Palestine Problem to the UN withdrew allowing only the Jews to their left behind army camps and weapons. Jewish guerrillas like Argon Zvai Leumi commanded by Menahim Begin (later Prime Minister) began a wave of terror and were responsible for massacres like Deir Yasin (a peaceful Palestinian Arab village) where all men, women and children were mercilessly and ruthlessly massacred. The victims had no arms to defend themselves. Following this, Menahim Begin sent out an 'Order of the Day' to his band of terrorists: "Accept my congratulations on this splendid act of conquest.....As of Deir Yasin, so everywhere we will attack and smite the enemy, God, God, thou has chosen us for conquest." This and the following massacres drove fear and panic into the Arab population, and led to the flight of unarmed civilians from their homes all over the country. This operation was in line with dozens of attacks carried out at that time by the Haganah and Palmach, in the course of which houses full of elderly people, women and children were blown up. Waves of thousands of refugees (Palestinian Exodus) fled to the neighboring countries.

The Palestinians were unable to defeat the organized and well armed Jewish attacks. Neighboring Arab Armies came in for help but their advance was halted by the armistice set by the UN. The Israeli "War of Independence!" in 1948-49 resulted in the expansion of the Jewish state from 55 percent of Palestine to 78 percent.

The Israeli Zionists carried out one of history's great acts of ethnic cleansing: the expulsion of some 750,000 Palestinians, or 80 per cent the native population of Palestine, from the borders of the newly established Jewish state.

In May 1948 the State of Israel was established. Few minutes later the United States and the USSR recognized the newly established State of Israel and very soon was recognized by the UN.

The USA supported the invasion and occupation of Palestine since May 14, 1948 by Zionists whose ancestors from the beginning of time had never set foot in Palestine; who spent millions of dollars broadcasting to the world their Big Lie that their illegal invasion of Palestine was "the repatriation of God's chosen people to their promised land." It is the world's most lawless, brutal and unjust occupation.

Analogy:

American Indians ethnic cleansing, from an estimated 12 million in 1500 to barely 237,000 in 1900: The Americans crushed Native-American beliefs and practices. These acts were justified by the theory of Manifest Destiny, which stated that European descendants acting for the U.S. government had a God-given right to take land from the Native Americans. "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee is Brown's best-known work"

The Law of Return granted the right of return to Jews who had never lived in Palestine while denying the right of return to Palestinians who had lived there for generations. Some families could trace their origins in Palestine back to the Islamic conquest of the 7th century.

Who Chose The Chosen People
It is a Must Watch

Who Created Israel ? The Story Behind Zionist Jews

Click & watch Rabbi Yisroel Weiss at Fox News

Click and watch this video before you start reading

A brief history of Jewish terrorism and Israeli false-flag operations.

Christian Zionism is the glue that keeps present day state of Israel alive on the US taxpayer's dole.

Click & watch: Our Story
By Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi.flv

The present path that the state of Israel is on is unsustainable. The occupation of another people and the denial of their national aspirations and their rights is not only morally unacceptable, it is a fatal threat to the entire enterprise of the state of Israel.

US President Benjamin Franklin's comments on Jews

During the drafting of the Constitution in 1789, Benjamin Franklinsaid at the convention concerning Jewish immigration. (Original in the Franklin Institute, Philadelphia.)

"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen , in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain."

"For more than 1700 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as theirproperty , they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race."

"If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands."

"I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jew forever, your children`s children will curse you in your grave."

"Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions."

"They should be excluded by the Constitution."

- Ben Franklin....1789

Alan Hart At Freiburg Conference 11 Sep. 2011

I describe the conflict in and over Palestine that became the Zionist - not Jewish! - state of Israel as the cancer at the heart of international affairs; and I believe that without a cure this cancer will consume us all.

I also believe that almost nothing is more important than crossing and actually eliminating the boundaries that have prevented, and to a very large extent do still prevent, informed and honest discussion about who must do what and why for justice for the Palestinians and peace for all. And that�s why I was pleased to accept an invitation to address this conference.

Click and read Israeli Leaders' Words

Jewish academic Dr Agustin Velloso:

"Israel is a state that violates international law since it was established, disobeys United Nations’ resolutions, illegally occupies and colonises Arab territory, attacks defenceless civilians causing thousands of dead and injured, subjects the entire population of the Gaza Strip – more than half of whom are children – to a siege which hardly varies from that imposed by the Nazis in the concentration camps."

WHY 9/11?,
a new video narrated by Daniel A. McGowan,
Professor Emeritus of Hobart and William Smith Colleges.
Watch this video

Click to read:
Breaking the Taboo on Israel's Spying Efforts
on the United States

Gilad Atzmon is a former Israeli soldier who now lives in London. He is not only a renowned author and writer but also a famous award-winning jazz musician. Described as a musical genius he has recorded with the likes of Robbie Williams, Sinead O Connor, Robert Wyatt Paul McCartney, Tunisian singer Dhaffer Youssef and countless others.

Born and brought up as a Zionist in Israel, Atzmon believes it was his love of music that first opened his eyes to the world. "I was brought up to believe that Jews were the chosen people and no one was better than us. Then I discovered jazz and found out that many of the great jazz musicians were black Afro-Americans. That was the first dent in the theory of our greatness and as I picked up the stones more truths began to come out." At 19, Atzmon was stationed as a soldier to Lebanon where he saw for the first time thousands of Palestinians living as refugees. "We were told that the Palestinians had left and gone to other Arab countries, so when I saw thousands of refugees living without the basics I realized that we had stolen their land." Atzmon also witnessed the atrocities the Israeli Army was committing against the Palestinians; so as soon as he could, he left the army and left the country for good.

Click and read the whole article

Palestine/Israel History since 1878 - A Video

Jeff Gates:

"The history of Israel as a geopolitical fraud will fill entire libraries as those defrauded marvel at how so few deceived so many for so long. Those duped include many naive Jews who "even now" identify their interests with this extremist enclave. Israeli leaders are wrong to worry about "de-legitimization."

They are right to fear that a long-deceived public is fast realizing that Israel's founding was key to an ongoing deception. The Invention of the Jewish People did not begin with Shlomo Sand's 2009 bestseller by that title. There was no Exile says this Jewish scholar. Nor was there an Exodus. So how could there be a Return, the core premise of Israeli statehood? If this patch of Palestinian land never rightly belonged to a mythical Jewish People, what then for the legitimacy of the "Jewish homeland."

Quotation from
"The Case Against Israel"
By
Michael Neumann
(a Jew of German origin)
"There is a big difference between a minority wanting to be a people and actually being one. Most of these differences have increased rather than diminished with the evolution of Israel. That most North American Jews are fervent supporters of Israel does not trump the fact that Jews are, for the most part, members of other peoples: American Jews are Americans; Mexican Jews are Mexicans, and so on. They have rights of citizenship in their respective countries; they speak the language of those countries (most don't speak Hebrew or Yiddish); they are increasingly secular and, therefore, lack whatever bond religion might impart. They have no collective institutions, either political or cultural. They have no leaders. The rise of Israel has created not a Jewish people, but an ethnically diverse Israeli people, of whom 20 percent are non-Jewish. So, perhaps Zionists should not be too upset if one does not accept a politically viable right of the self-determination of peoples."

Another quotation from the same book:

"Zionists came thousands of miles (to Palestine), not merely to settle or immigrate, but to erect a Jewish state. The leaders literally conspired to dispossess or dominate the Palestinians. Though many Zionists ventured into Palestine with the ignorance and swagger of colonial adventures, and others arrived dazzled by Utopian visions, all were engaged in a project that represented a moral threat to the indigenous inhabitants, who had done them no harm. Though some of those who constituted this threat were innocents, no adult Zionist can be said to have posed an innocent threat. They should have known better. They had a responsibility to know better. Zionism was no worse than many ethnic nationalisms nurtured by nineteenth-century European culture. But they were, all of them, a bad and dangerous idea. It was the implementation of this idea that made bloodshed in Palestine. That blood is on the Zionist's hands."

A comment by Jean Bricmont, professor of theoretical physics at the Universite Catholique de Louvin, Belgium, about the above book:

"A lot has been written on the Israeli-Palestine conflict-lots of facts and even more fictions. But what is often missing, and what this book provides, is a lucid and definitive moral analysis of the rights and the wrongs in the conflict. From Neumann's analysis, it emerges that on fundamental issues, Israel is in the wrong, and the Palestinians in the right."

I quote Richard H. Curtiss on May/June 1991, page 17:" Why must the US deal with seemingly intractable dispute. The answer, unfortunately is that the US is largely responsible for the problem because of two American decisions in 1947 and 1948. Now, only the US can break the impasse, by forcing its Israeli client state to give back all or most of the land the UN allotted to Muslim and Christian inhabitants when it partitioned Palestine in 1947.

In 1967 war the rest of Palestine was occupied by Israel until this moment, resulting in masses of refugees. The refugees (1948 and 1967) are still living in camps in miserable conditions. The Palestinian Refugees have been a United Nations responsibility for over 50 years. Israel would not allow them to go back to their homes and lands in Palestine.

A quote from an article by Noam Chomsky in the Guardian, May 11, 2002:

"The Palestinians have long suffered torture, terror, destruction of property, displacement and settlement, and takeover of basic resources, crucially water. These policies have relied on decisive US support and European acquiescence."

Dr. Ilan Pappe is a Professor of History at Haifa University, Israel. This article is based upon the transcript of a lecture presented by Dr. Pappe to the Right To Return Coalition - Al Awda UK, held at the School for Oriental and African Studies in London Monday 16th September 2002.

Click to see the Maps

israelibanner.jpg (19098 bytes)

April 7, 2001 New York City

Qoute from Revilo P. Oliver's book "The Jewish Strategy:

"...so far as we can tell, a distinct change has taken place in the Jews' activity in this century and at approximately the time of the 'Protocols.' Before this, the aliens seem to have been content to exploit the Aryans and, in biological terms, feed on them; the present objective is obviously extermination of our species through mongrelization and massacres, so that it would seem that the organization and domination of the Jewish colonies by the Zionists produced a change in purpose that must, to a large extent at least, have been consciously determined and planned."

Click and read this article:
Is Leaked Zionist Plan Pertinent to US?

A quote from Rabbi Elmer Berger's "Prophecy, Zionism and the state of Israel":

"The present State of Israel has no right whatsoever to claim the accomplishment of the divine project for a Messianic age.... It is pure demagogy of soil and blood."

Micah spells it out clearly :

"Hear, I pray you, O heads of Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel that abhor judgment and pervert all equity. They build up Zion with blood, and Jerusalem with inequity..."

"The Palestinian uprising or intifada and the Israeli campaign to suppress it have caused considerable anguish for many Jews around the world. A large number of Jews have even begun to reassess their support for Israel and critically analyze the ideology of Zionism which legitimates the Jewish state. One example of this phenomenon is a statement that appeared in The Nation on February 3, 1988. It was endorsed by 18 prominent American Jews. The advertisement called upon American Jews to "dissociate from Israel." It expressed the concern that "the close identification in the public mind between Israel and Jews -- an equation vigorously fostered by both the Zionist movement and the Israel Lobby, which has come under its control -- threatens to stigmatize Jews everywhere." The ad called for a two-state solution and for negotiations with the Palestine Liberation Organization. The statement also discussed past discrimination against the Jews and the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust adding: How tragic that in our own time the very state established by Jews in the aftermath of this evil has become a place where racialism, religious discrimination, militarism and injustice prevail; and that Israel itself has become a pariah state within the world community. Events taking place today are all too reminiscent of the pogroms from which our own forefathers fled two and three generations ago -- but this time those in authority are Jews and the victims are Muslims and Christian Palestinians." ...End of quote.

In Nazi Germany they had an evil mantra called 'the master race', and here in Israel they have an equally diabolical one called the 'chosen people'.

In Nazi Germany, they had the Untermensch concept, and here in Israel they have the 'goyim' whose rights and lives are expendable.

"In Nazi Germany they had the idea of 'Lebensraum', and Israel they argue that 'Jews have got to live somewhere', a euphemism for stealing Palestinian land and expelling these helpless and powerless people from their ancestral homeland, all for the purpose of fulfilling Jewish nationalism, a nationalism that has more in common with Hitler's Mein Kampf than with the Torah of Moses." Read the article "Sarkozy:
The Extraordinary Zionist"

During the Six Day War between Israel and the Arab States, the American intelligence ship USS Liberty was attacked for 75 minutes in international waters by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats. Thirty-four men died and 171 were wounded. On August 9, 2001, the History Channel presented the long awaited program entitled "Cover Up: Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty."

The late George Ball, under secretary of state under President John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson and long-time Bilderberg luminary, expressed outrage over the Israeli attack, James Akins, former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said. Ball wrote of the attack: "Israel knew it could get away with anything." If Israel had succeeded in sinking the ship with all aboard, the attack would have been blamed on Egypt, Ball said. He referred to Israel "murdering Americans." Getting an investigation is difficult, Akins said, because "Congress is Israeli-occupied territory."

USS Liberty

I quote Charley Reese:

"Self-determination is a must for Albanians in Kosovo - not for Palestinians.

Refugees have a right to return or receive compensation - but not Palestinian refugees.

Countries must obey U.N. Security Council resolutions - but not Israel, which sits in defiance of more than 60.

Countries that routinely violate human rights deserve sanctions - except Israel.

Countries that assassinate political enemies are state sponsors of terrorism - but not Israel.

Countries must not use American-donated weapons for offensive purposes - except for Israel.

People who commit war crimes must be put on trial - unless they are Israelis."

I quote Rabbi David Weiss:

"Our prayer to God is that the Israeli state be speedily and peacefully dismantled without any further shedding of Jewish or Palestinian blood and that we be worthy of seeing the full revelation of God's glory in the world. Amen".

Stephen B.L. Penrose, President of the American University of Beirut 1948- 54, some fifty years ago wrote, in the Daily Star, regretfully of US policies that betrayed a national goodwill in the Arab World toward American principles of justice, and the deep Arab distrust of US intentions in the region and an apprehension well-founded on the ever growing chasm between American words and deeds.

Related Quotes

Palestine Defended on the BBC

Christian Zionism: Justifying Apartheid in the Name of God

The Israelphiles (the Christian Zionists) warn Americans that their country will be blessed only as they give their unfailing support to natural Israel, no matter what that rogue entity does to her neighbors.

United Nations:
The Origins And Evolution Of The Palestine Problem,
1917-1947

Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics and chair of the Peace & Justice Studies Program at the University of San Francisco, is the author of Tinderbox: U.S. Middle East Policy and the Roots of Terrorism (Common Courage) and the editor of Nonviolent Social Movements: A Geographical Perspective

William A. Cook:
February 23, 2010

What is the true nature of this state of Israel that commands the allegiance of the American people and is now seeking to enlist the governments of the world against its perceived �existential� enemy, Iran?

* It is a state without mercy, a state without morals, a state premised on racism, a state built on deception and lies;

* a state defiant of international law, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Geneva Conventions that apply to occupying powers;

* a state, unlike North Korea or Iran, the other identified Axis of Evil states, that has invaded neighboring states and occupies them;

* a state, unlike all nations in the Mid-East, that possesses weapons of mass destruction, including hundreds of nuclear weapons, and refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty;

* a state that uses cluster bombs, white phosphorus, and other internationally banned weapons of warfare, not only against the innocent people of Lebanon, but also against the defenseless people of Palestine;

* a state that proclaims itself above the law as it executes individuals without arrest, without charges brought, without counsel, without habeas corpus, and without trial by jury;

* a state that imprisons over 10,000 Palestinians without charge and without due process;

* a state that tortures those it imprisons;

* a state that constructs a wall, in defiance of the International Court of Justice and the United Nations, that encircles the Palestinians with full intention of decimating their economy and hence their livelihood as well as their chance to create a state of their own, while inflicting a psychological humiliation that is inhumane and in defiance of every principle of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; * a state that has systematically confiscated, appropriated, annexed, and assimilated virtually all land belonging to the Palestinians in a sixty-year period of time, leaving them approximately 14 percent of their original land, making it the greatest visible land theft known to human kind in our day;

* a state whose laws protect a group that belongs to a religion and denies equality of citizenship to all others including the indigenous people of the land;

* a state that has defied more than 160 UNGA and 39 UNSC resolutions, demanding it act as a civilized state abiding by international law and protocol;

* a state that will not tolerate interference by the UN in its calculated genocide of the Palestinian people;

* a state that, through its Zionist supporters in America, particularly AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), influences U.S. policy in the Mid-East that has resulted in the unlawful invasion of Iraq and irrational economic and political procedures against Syria and Iran;

* a state that has convinced our Congress that it provide billions of dollars to ensure that the state of Israel continues this genocide of the Palestinian people;

* a state that proclaims itself a democracy but is not and, with malicious intent, confiscates the money belonging to a democratically elected government in Palestine and arrests their representatives without charge or trial;

* a state that proclaims peace but creates conditions that prevent peace;

* a state that, like the United States under Bush, has reached the nadir of the civilized state, a return to lawless barbarism inflicted on the weak by the strong, the imposition of the will of the few on the many;

* and, finally, in all brazen hypocrisy, a state that cries to the world that it is the victim of unspeakable cruelty and in constant peril of obliteration by forces within and without. And we wonder why the United States is castigated throughout the world when it supports this rogue state, this state without mercy.

Great is truth, sayeth the Prophet, and it shall prevail, if not for those now living perhaps for the dead who have suffered the consequence of this deceit; it is to them, to the dead, says Voltaire, we owe only truth. Thus ends the second prayer.

William A. Cook is Professor of English at the University of La Verne in southern California. He serves as senior editor at MWC News and has written for Counterpunch, the Palestine Chronicle, the Pacific Free Press, the Atlantic Free Press, Information Clearing House, Dissident Voice among others. His books on the mid-east include Tracking Deception: Bush Mid-East Policy, The Rape of Palestine, and a fictional work, The Chronicles of Nefaria, to be published soon in Arabic.

Will just, durable and everlasting PEACE ever prevail in

The Holy Land?

Again let us pray for a just and durable everlasting peace.

In the meantime, don't expect to see peace and goodwill in the Holy Land any time soon.

Why Are Jews Persecuted?
Commentary
By Jayne Gardener

I always used to wonder what it was about Jews that made people throughout history despise them. If they were indeed "God's chosen"

I thought, they had to be the unluckiest people in the history of the world.

Why were they persecuted throughout history? Why had the Nazis herded them into cattle cars and taken them to "extermination camps" to dispose once and for all of the "Jewish problem?"

I suddenly recognized that if Hitler had developed a "Final Solution" to the Jewish question, that there had to have been a "Jewish Problem.

" Could the Jews have in any way behaved in such a manner that would make the countries in which they resided turn against them, or were they just unfortunate, innocent victims?

I set out to find answers for my questions, mainly turning to the Internet, but also reading various books on the subject. What I found became increasingly disturbing to me.

I had not known that throughout history, the Jews had been expelled from 79 countries, some countries more than once.

I had not known that many of the claims they made about the Holocaust that I had believed unquestioningly for so long were in fact fraudulent.

The books I had read and the movies I had seen about the "Holocaust" and wept over were nothing but thinly veiled attempts to garner unwavering sympathy for the state of Israel and an excuse to extort billions of dollars from Germany and 1.25 billion dollars from the Swiss banks.

I discovered that a book I had read many times as a teenager and cried about, Anne Frank's Diary, had been at least partially written by someone other than Anne Frank.

I learned that the confessions at the Nuremburg Trials and the executions of so many German "war criminals" were extracted under torture and the defendants were being tried, judged and condemned by their very accusers.

I learned about the "false flag" operations, especially the Lavon affair and the tragedy of the USS Liberty, an American ship that was attacked by the Israelis during the 1967 war. 34 young American men were killed and many more wounded.

To add insult to injury, the Israelis claimed that it was simply an unfortunate case of mistaken identity, something the survivors of the Liberty have always vehemently denied. They, however, were threatened with court martial if they were ever to tell their stories.

I learned about the Jonathan Pollard spy case and other incidents of Israeli Jews spying against their supposed "closest ally."

I became shocked and horrified as I learned about the treatment of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories at the hands of the Israeli Defense Forces and the Jewish settlers. Israel purports to be the only democracy in the middle east, but it's only a democracy for Jews. Non-Jews are not considered equal.

I was saddened to see pictures of innocent Palestinian children burned beyond recognition or suffering from serious gunshot wounds after being targeted by the IDF for no other reason than that they are Palestinian.

I found out about the Jewish history of avariciousness, larceny, lying, manipulation and their questionable and usurious business practices.

I learned about their roles in the radical homosexual movement, the radical feminist movement, the pornography industry as well as their over-representation in the abortion industry.

I discovered their role in organized crime, in the slave trade, in the civil rights movement and in Communism, an ideology that is responsible for the deaths of untold millions and the repression of many millions more.

I learned that it was Jewish supremacists behind the war against Christianity and Christmas. It is they who want God out of the Pledge of Allegiance and all symbols of Christianity removed from public life.

They have driven Christianity from the public schools despite Christianity being the majority religion.

They have taken Christmas out of the public school calendar despite the fact that it is a statutory holiday and it is named Christmas.

I read about the anti-Gentilism and hatefulness of the Babylonian Talmud and their utter disrespect for, and hostility towards Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary and Christianity and Christians in general.

I learned about their "chutzpah" in claiming that Gentile lives were worth no more than the lives of barnyard animals but that they considered Jewish lives to be akin to God Himself. It's okay to steal from a Gentile or to kill a Gentile, but Jewish lives are sacred.

I learned of their control of the majority of wealth, the media and academia despite them making up less than 2% of the population (even lower in Canada).

They are behind the ridiculous political correctness movement and hate crime legislation that was drafted so as to silence anyone who might figure out their agenda and attempt to shed light on it.

Men like German Rudolf, David Irving and many more, previously recognized as great historians, were arrested, charged with hate crimes and incarcerated simply for having made academic inquiry into a specific period of history.

Other so called "revisionists" or "holocaust deniers" have been intimidated, harassed, assaulted and smeared simply for trying to get at the truth.

It is patently clear that the war in Iraq is due solely to Israel wanting to hobble her enemies by destabilizing their governments in order to achieve hegemony in the middle east.

It would be unthinkable for Israeli Jews to die for this cause, so they manipulated the US into the war with the help of the Jewish Zionist "Israel firsters" in the Bush administration in order that the blood of way too many young American men and women is shed instead.

It is they who control the middle eastern foreign policy of the most powerful country in the world, the USA. It is they who control congress, the senate and the puppet president, George W. Bush.

They have such control in movies and television that we are now subjected to endless programs and Hollywood movies that mock Christianity, Christian values and degrade the traditional family.

After sober reflection on what I had discovered about Jewish supremacy and Zionism, I had to abandon all my previously held notions as to the history of Jewish persecution.

What I have trouble understanding is why they continue this behavior in whichever society they live, knowing that eventually they will overplay their hand and their perfidy will be exposed yet again. Has history taught them nothing?

As more and more people become aware of what is going on and who is responsible for it, anger is going to rise as it already has in the former Soviet Union and eastern European countries. They may control television, movies and the print media, but they don't control the internet. At least not yet. Blogs and websites devoted to "outing" the Jewish supremacists will ultimately be their downfall.

If everyone who sees this information passes it on to at least one other person, the crimes and misdeeds of the Jewish supremacists and Zionists will be exposed. Please, do your part.

For those who have tried to find the "road to peace" in the Middle East, it has been a treacherous journey, inevitably ending in bitter disappointment

...."Andrew Hurley"

Other people may be there to help us, teach us, guide us along our path. But the lesson to be learned is always ours~ (Melody Beattie)

Click for the links

links_md_wht.gifg (17847 bytes)

go to the top

Thank you for visiting my web site.
Please call again soon and don't forget
to sign my guestbook
and visit my guestmap before you leave.

My Guestbook:

Please visit my guestmap

You Are Visitor Number: